Philippines Country Profile

Quick country select
Page available in:

Philippine Public Anti-Corruption Initiatives

  • Legislation: The Philippines has ratified the United Nations Convention against Corruption. However, according to the 2012 Civil Society Review of the Philippines’ compliance with the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC), the Philippines’ legal and enforcement regime is only “partially in compliance with the standards and principles of the UNCAC”, as stated in a 2012 report published by the Partnership for Research in International Affairs and Development (PRIAD). Corrupt practices are addressed by the Anti-Graft and Corrupt Practices Act and the Anti-Money Laundering Act of 2001, which criminalise attempted corruption, active and passive bribery, extortion, bribing a foreign official, using confidential state information for private gain, money laundering and organised crime. The Anti-Graft and Corrupt Practices Act requires public officials to file a Statements of Assets and Liability and Net Worth (SALN) every second year. The Act to Further Strengthen the Anti-Money Laundering Law and the Terrorism Financing Prevention and Suppression Act of 2012 are presented as a tool for the government both to fight against transnational crime and terrorism and to grant additional investigatory authority and powers to improve transparency and accountability. According to a news article published by GMA News in February 2013, President Aquino signed a third amendment to the Anti-Money Laundering Act, covering a bigger number of predicate crimes. The Constitution 1987 includes articles on accountability of public officials and SALN (Art. IX, sect. 1-18). The Act Establishing a Code of Conduct and Ethical Standards for Public Officials and Employees formulates standards for the personal integrity and accountability of civil servants. Rules on gifts are included in the code of conduct and explicitly forbids solicitations of gifts, favours, etc. The Revised Penal Code also defines gifts as bribes (Art. 210), and the Anti-Graft and Corrupt Practices Act forbids officials from receiving gifts (sect. 3). However, Global Integrity 2010 states that the regulations governing gifts and hospitality offered to civil servants are poorly enforced in practice. The Constitution 1987 (Art. 6, sect. 20; Art. 2, sect. 28; and Art. 3, sect. 7) stipulates that transparency must be upheld by requiring all records of Congress to be preserved and made open to the public and the Commission on Audit (see below) to annually publish a list of amounts paid and expenses used by each member of Congress. The new Freedom of Information Act 2013 was approved by the Senate and submitted to the House of Representatives, according to in September 2013; however, the government has not yet passed it at the time of review. Access the Lexadin World Law Guide for a collection of laws in the Philippines.
  • Government StrategiesAccording to Inquirer in January 2014, the most recent anti-corruption strategy undertaken by the government is the requirement for cashless and checkless government transactions, which aims to improve budget management and prevent misappropriate funds. The strategy will first target the armed forces, the Department of National Defense and the Department of Budget and Management, and electronic purchase cards will be used for payments for meals, medical supplies, airline tickets and the like. According to AFTA Sources, recent government strategies include the Philippine Development Plan (PDP) for 2011-2016 and Good Governance and Anti-Corruption Cluster (GGAC) plan for 2012-2016. According to a January 2012 article by Business Mirror, among the measures provided in the plan is the simplification and integration of various government databases and systems to make them more publicly accessible. The low-level of business confidence in the judicial system led to the implementation of the Action Programme for Judicial Reform, proposed and developed by a former chief justice and supported by several international donors, to rectify the deficiencies in the judicial system. However, the New York Times reports in August 2013 that the government’s anti-corruption reforms and strategies are perceived by some as being complicated and overwhelming; moreover, there is lack of cooperation between different government agencies, resulting in poor implementation. 

  • Anti-Corruption Agencies: According to Global Integrity 2010, the Office of the Ombudsman (see below) serves as the main anti-corruption agency authorised to investigate and prosecute corruption cases involving public officials. The office is also in charge of undertaking corruption prevention measures, such as awareness-raising campaigns and analysing anti-corruption initiatives. However, Global Integrity 2010 suggests that anti-corruption agencies are subject to political interference and do not usually carry out independent investigation. The same report evaluates the overall effectiveness of the anti-corruption agencies in the Philippines as very weak.

  • Office of the Ombudsman: According to Global Integrity 2010, the Office of the Ombudsman serves as the country's leading anti-corruption agency. Criticism of the Office has focused on it targeting petty corruption instead of the 'big fish'. This is supported by Global Integrity 2010, which reports that the ombudsman has been turning a blind eye to a series of corruption complaints against individuals who are closely tied to the former president. The same report also states that the Office of Ombudsman is subject to political interference, and it infrequently makes investigations or reports public. In April 2011, Ombudsman Merceditas Gutierrez resigned after politicians voted to impeach her. Gutierrez was accused of failing to probe corruption allegations against former President Arroyo and her administration, as reported in an April 2011 article by BBC News. In July 2011, President Aquino appointed former Supreme Court Associate Justice Conchita Carpio-Morales as the new ombudsman. The Lifestyle Check Coalition (LCC) is a strategy which investigates the ethics and lifestyles of government officials. The president of the Anti-Graft Commission (PAGC) signed a memorandum of agreement (MOA) with 10 of the most corruption prone public agencies to mandate them to submit at least one ‘big fish’ case or lifestyle check to either the PAGC or the Office of the Ombudsman every three months.

  • Anti-Money Laundering Council (AMLC): The AMLC's tasks are to carry out investigations into money laundering activities and to analyse data from banks and financial institutions regulated by the Central Bank of the Republic of the Philippines, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and the Insurance Commission (IC). According to the House of Representatives, the AMLC can file complaints with the Office of the Ombudsman and the Department of Justice (DOJ) to prosecute offenerders of money laundering and start civil forfeiture proceedings in cooperation with the Office of the Solicitor General (OSG). The Investment Climate Statement 2013 reports that the government has been working on addressing the problems related to the AMLC pointed out by the Asia Pacific Group, which resulted in two amendments to the AMLA: The Act to Further Strengthen the Anti-Money Laundering Law and the Terrorism Financing Prevention and Suppression Act.

  • Commission on Audit (COA): The COA was established in accordance with the Constitution 1987. It not only monitors government financial operations - it also has the authority to examine and audit all public financial transactions. Furthermore, it plays an important role in promoting transparency and accountability in public financial transactions. In this capacity, the COA is currently engaged in implementing the electronic New Government Accounting System. In the pursuit of greater transparency, the COA has launched an interactive portal that has a Fraud Alert Form, with which whistleblowers can easily report fraud, mismanagement and waste of public funds. However, the portal cannot guarantee anonymity. According to Global Integrity 2010, although some COA reports offer very useful guidelines for checking corruption in specific government agencies, the COA does not have the authority to prosecute and impose reform measures on faltering agencies. Furthermore, the government does not always follow up on COA recommendations.

  • Commission on Elections (COMELEC): The COMELEC represents an attempt to rid elections of irregularities such as election-rigging, vote-buying and corruption. However, the COMELEC's reputation has been tarnished by several scandals. In order to combat electoral malpractice, a new e-election system overseen by the COMELEC was utilised in the May 2010 presidential elections. According to Countries at the Crossroads 2011, although there were still some cases of fraud, the problems were far less common than in previous elections.

  • E-Governance: The Bureau of Internal Revenues (BIR) has become more transparent with the use of an electronic information exchange to connect to the One-Stop Shop Inter-Agency Tax Credit and Duty Drawback Center. The Bureau of Customs has also set up web-enabled clearance and payment service. The Philippine Government Electronic Procurement System (PhilGEPS) was launched by the Department of Budget and Management. According to a January 2012 article by Business Mirror, the government is planning to expand the operations of PhilGEPS to include e-bidding functions. The Official Gazette has also been transformed into a one-stop shop to provide government information.The E-Government Survey 2012 shows that the Philippine government's overall commitment to develop e-governmence is high at the regional level, yet the Philippines scored low at the global level in terms of e-governmence development. 

  • Public Procurement: The Government Procurement Reform Act 2003 grants preference to companies of at least 60% Filipino ownership, thus favouring local suppliers. A government e-procurement system has been implemented in most government departments and government-controlled companies and organisations to help reduce graft and corruption. Procurements are mandated by the Act to be published to the general public, and Global Integrity 2010 has determined that major public procurements are effectively advertised through agency websites or newspapers. The Philippine Government Electronic Procurement System (PhilGEPS) is the central online portal where all public procurement activities are posted. This is meant to be a vehicle to increase transparency of the government procurement process. If bidders are found to be providing false information or otherwise violating bidding regulations, they may be blacklisted. The list of debarred bidders can be found on the Government Procurement Policy Board website. Procurement manuals and documents are also available on the website. However, Global Integrity 2010 reports that the system for blacklisting is not always effectively enforced, as there have been cases where companies found guilty of bribery were able to change their names and continue to participate in future bids. As a means of inhibiting opportunities for conflicts of interest within public procurement, decisions regarding procurement are made by a panel consisting of 5-7 regularly rotating officials. Another government initiative meant to improve procurement transparency is the creation of Procurement Transparency Group under the Executive Order 662-A. The group is led by the Government Procurement Policy Board, and its main tasks include evaluating and monitoring government procurements.
  • CoST Philippines: The Philippines was selected as one of eight pilot countries for the Construction Sector Transparency Initiative (CoST). CoST is a voluntary multi-stakeholder initiative designed to be applicable to any country and to any government department or agency with responsibility for public sector construction projects. The Philippine committee overseeing the implementation of CoST consists of members from government, the construction industry, civil society, academia and development organisations. CoST aims at promoting the concepts of transparency and accountability in the construction sector and focuses specifically on public disclosure of information. The ultimate aim is to enhance the accountability of procuring bodies and construction companies for the cost and quality of public sector construction projects. Disclosure requirements in procurement proclamation and directives have since been integrated into the Philippines Government and Electronic Procurement System (PhilGEPS). Similarly, the CoST assurance process has been integrated into the Commission on Audit (COA). 
  • Whistleblowing: There is no specific whistleblower protection law in the Philippines, according to Global Integrity 2010; whistleblower protection is currently covered by Republic Act No. 6981, and its overall function remains very weak. However, a 2012 report published by the Partnership for Research in International Affairs and Development (PRIAD) states that the government strives to implement a stronger whistleblowing protection law as part of its new Anti-Corruption Plan (2012-2016). As of April 2014, there is no information available related to the implementation of a stronger whistleblowing protection law.